Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rockers United
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Given the lack of commentary, this is a WP:SOFTDELETE Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 10:17, 20 August 2016 (UTC)
- Rockers United (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
In evaluating the notability of this topic, I was only able to find three (!) reliable sources cover the subject at all. The most direct source is from Loudwire ([1]), which devotes one of six paragraphs to it, but that hardly counts as significant coverage. The remaining sources all barely address it.
- Revolver, Photos: Rockers Against Trafficking Benefit Show Used in article, mention of "Rockers Against Trafficking", presumably the same but trivial mention regardless
- Loudwire, Papa Roach to Headline ‘Rock for Freedom’ Human Trafficking Benefit Discusses one of their campaigns, but does not address the organization in-depth; all it gives is the kind of information you could get from a flyer. —0xF8E8 (talk) 04:03, 29 July 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 08:13, 29 July 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. North America1000 02:09, 31 July 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:27, 5 August 2016 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:27, 5 August 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:47, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:47, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.